|
Like all
organisations, the Costa Animal Society has its critics, and as one
which spends money donated by the public, it strives to keep its
operations transparent and open. However, two specific criticisms
continue to circulate.
First, how can CAS allow commercial kennel operators to be on its
committee?
The CAS committee consists of 13 members, some of whom operate
kennels used by the organisation. However, four members of the
committee – the president, vicepresident, secretary and treasurer –
form an executive which concerns itself with the legal, political
and financial aspects of the group. None of these four has a
business interest in any commercial kennels or other services for
which CAS must pay.
CAS could not function without the goodwill and flexibility of the
kennel owners who not only charge reduced prices to the charity but
also take on many other voluntary responsibilities in addition to
organising their own fundraising events for CAS.
Second, why doesn’t CAS have its own kennels?
To open new kennels, suitable land would have to be found (a major
problem in this area) and purchased; architects and legal advisors
would have to be employed, and a construction firm hired to build
the centre. This would clearly cost several hundreds of thousands of
euros before even one dog could be housed.
In addition, staff would have to be employed, with consequent
salaries and social security payments to be paid. It would also
require an operating licence from the town hall and these are not
obtained easily.
CAS feels the money would be better spent looking after animals by
using existing kennels, all of which are kind enough to offer
reduced rates and do not worry too much when funds run low and the
monthly bill is paid weeks and weeks late.
In addition, the existence of a wonderful network of foster families
is proving so effective in not only reducing housing costs but also
in improving the socialisation of dogs, making them much easier to
home permanently. The value CAS places on these foster families
cannot be over emphasised.
|